Comparison of Regression Performance Metrics (MAE, MSE,RMSE,MAPE)

MetricFull FormWhat It MeasuresUnitsSensitive to OutliersWhen to UseWhen NOT to Use
MAEMean Absolute ErrorAverage absolute difference between actual and predicted valuesSame as target (₹, days, marks)LowWhen all errors matter equally; data has outliers; want easy interpretationWhen large errors are very costly
MSEMean Squared ErrorAverage of squared prediction errorsSquared units (₹², days²)Very HighDuring model training and optimization; mathematical convenienceFor interpretation or reporting to humans
RMSERoot Mean Squared ErrorSquare root of MSE (penalizes large errors)Same as targetHighWhen large errors are dangerous (medical, finance, engineering)When outliers dominate and typical error matters
MAPEMean Absolute Percentage ErrorAverage error as a percentage of actual valuePercentage (%)MediumWhen comparing across different scales; business & forecastingWhen actual values can be zero or very small

One-Line Intuition for Each Metric

  • MAE → “On average, how much am I wrong?”
  • MSE → “How badly do big mistakes hurt my model?”
  • RMSE → “How serious are large errors, in real units?”
  • MAPE → “How wrong am I in percentage terms?”
ScenarioBest Metric
Simple interpretationMAE
Safety-critical systemsRMSE
Model training (optimization)MSE
Business / sales forecastingMAPE
Data has outliersMAE + RMSE together
Comparing models fairlyRMSE + MAPE

MAE measures average absolute error and is easy to interpret. MSE squares errors and is mainly used during model training. RMSE is the square root of MSE and penalizes large errors strongly, making it suitable for critical applications. MAPE expresses error in percentage terms and is useful for comparing predictions across different scales but fails when actual values are zero.